TrustRadius Insights
TeamCity has proven to be an invaluable tool for software development teams across various organizations. Users have utilized TeamCity in …
Overview
What is TeamCity?
TeamCity is a continuous integration server from Czeck company JetBrains.
Recent Reviews
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Pricing
N/A
Unavailable
What is TeamCity?
TeamCity is a continuous integration server from Czeck company JetBrains.
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/buy
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
Alternatives Pricing
What is Codemagic?
Codemagic is a developer's CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity, and Flutter projects on Codemagic.Codemagic uses its own CLI tools under the hood to perform complicated tasks like code signing and distribution to the stores. These are open-sourced and…
What is Appsmith?
Appsmith is an open source framework to build admin panels, CRUD apps and workflows.
Product Demos
Sitecore CI/CD with TeamCity and TDS Demo
YouTube
Redgate DLM Demo (with TFS, TeamCity, & Octopus Deploy)
YouTube
CI/CD with JetBrains TeamCity | TeamCity Tutorial
YouTube
Demo Teamcity Build Project 2 (end)
YouTube
TeamCity Fundamental Tutorial for Beginners with Demo || Class - 01 || By Visualpath
YouTube
TeamCity demo - part 1
YouTube
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is TeamCity?
A Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box test intelligence, real-time reporting on build problems, and boasts scalability. It is available both as an on-premises and a cloud-based version.
TeamCity Video
Getting Started with TeamCity
TeamCity Competitors
TeamCity Technical Details
| Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
| Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
TeamCity is a continuous integration server from Czeck company JetBrains.
The most common users of TeamCity are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(58)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
- Recommendations
TeamCity has proven to be an invaluable tool for software development teams across various organizations. Users have utilized TeamCity in their agile project management systems, specifically within the web development team, to streamline their workflow and enhance productivity. By seamlessly integrating their git repositories with their ticketing systems, users have been able to test and release code from the development environment to the production environment with ease.
The software's automation testing capabilities have been critical for both development and product support. With TeamCity, users have been able to evaluate and integrate numerous projects, pulling together over 300 components of their SaaS-based product. This has allowed them to schedule, execute, and generate reports for various types of automation testing, ensuring the quality and reliability of their software.
One of the standout features of TeamCity is its user-friendly interface. Users have praised how easy it is to navigate and manage builds and releases within the system. Additionally, TeamCity offers flexible templates through its templates, variables, and parameterization capabilities. This enables users to create common solutions, such as deploying MVC applications to IIS, quickly and efficiently.
TeamCity seamlessly integrates with several popular platforms like Git, Azure, AWS, and Visual Studio Team Services. This integration allows development teams to leverage existing tools in their CI/CD build process without any hassle.
While users appreciate the functionality provided by TeamCity, some have expressed a desire for more comprehensive deployment visualization features. However, this minor limitation does not detract from the overall effectiveness of the software.
Overall, TeamCity has become an essential tool for development teams looking to implement continuous integration and continuous deployment practices. By providing immediate feedback on code issues and enabling thorough testing before delivery to customers, TeamCity ensures a smooth and efficient development process. Its ease of configuration and implementation also makes it suitable for small organizations with multiple projects. With its ability to meet quality expectations by running automated unit tests and handling various environments, customers find great value in using TeamCity for their software development needs.
Reliable Performance: Many users have praised the product for its reliable performance. Several reviewers have stated that the product consistently meets their expectations and performs well without any issues.
User-friendly Interface: A significant number of customers have appreciated the user-friendly interface of the product. Numerous users mentioned that the interface is intuitive and easy to navigate, making it simple for them to use and understand all its features.
Great Customer Support: Several reviewers have expressed their satisfaction with the excellent customer support provided by the company. Users have reported positive experiences while seeking assistance from customer support representatives who were helpful, knowledgeable, and prompt in resolving their queries or concerns.
Long and Manual Upgrade Process: Many users have expressed frustration with the lengthy and manual upgrade process for TeamCity. They have found it to be time-consuming and cumbersome, requiring significant effort.
Lack of SaaS-based Solution: Several reviewers have mentioned their disappointment in the lack of a SaaS-based solution for TeamCity. This means that users are required to host and maintain a large server along with multiple build agents, which can be inconvenient and resource-intensive.
Weak Pipeline Visualization: A common concern among users is the weakness of TeamCity's pipeline visualization feature. They feel that it could benefit from improvements in terms of clarity and usability, as it currently falls short compared to other aspects of the platform.
- Users recommend TeamCity over Jenkins for its additional features, ease of use, and integration capabilities.
- They highly recommend TeamCity to IT companies and suggest that it is worth the investment for enterprise continuous integration.
- Users also recommend self-hosting TeamCity for small companies and mention its value compared to other services.
- Furthermore, they recommend taking advantage of the free trial, checking available plugins, and evaluating new major versions and security risks.
- Overall, users think TeamCity is a great product for build automation and continuous integration and consider it as one of the best CI tools available.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-3 of 3)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
May 07, 2019
TeamCity above all else
We use TeamCity as a CI/CD tool for our pre-production and production builds. We've set it up for near full automation use and have set it up with multiple steps for each build. TeamCity is used on a team-by-team basis here at my work. Several surrounding teams in many different departments use it with much success. TeamCity solves the problem of integrating other tools in the CI/CD build process without being too complicated or without too much overhead. Given a corporate firewall can cause great limitations, it's nice to have a tool that's simple to integrate with other tools.
- Build Automation: easy setup, one-click deployment, reliable use, great documentation/instruction.
- Tool Integration: great documentation, several existing examples, easy setup.
- Step tracking: clear pipeline display, easy to locate build logs, clear error messages.
- Desktop app: TeamCity is browser-based, and some may prefer having a desktop application to view deployments on.
- Tasteful UI: TeamCity has a simple, non-graphic UI that some may find boring or not as intriguing as some of the other options.
- TeamCity has greatly improved team efficiency by streamlining our production and pre-production pipelines. We moved to TeamCity after seeing other teams have more success with it than we had with other tools.
- TeamCity has helped the reliability of our product by easily allowing us to integrate unit testing, as well as full integration testing. This was not possible with other tools given our corporate firewall.
- TeamCity's ability to include Docker containers in the pipeline steps has been crucial in improving our efficiency and reliability.
I would also like to compare TeamCity against Snap-Ci as well as Concourse. We chose TeamCity over all of these tools because of its ability to be set up easily against a restricting corporate firewall. We needed to integrate unit tests, integration tests, pushes to production, and Docker containers into our CI, but were not able to with the other tools. We found other teams in other departments were having great success with TeamCity so we decided to give it a try and had the same great success. Good documentation is key, and you will definitely find that with TeamCity. There are several extensions or tools available to further modify TeamCity to your needs, but it is an excellent tool out of the box.
May 25, 2018
TeamCity 7 Years On!
Our company has two products. 1 of which, TeamCity is the critical tool for development and for both products, it's the critical tool for automation testing. In all cases, both development and product support use it. It's the tool which pulls together the 300+ components that make up our current SaaS-based product and the tool which schedules, executes and produces reports for all our type of automation testing (behavioral, backward compatibility, performance, security, and load).
- A very friendly UI with good drill-down and "Pro" capabilities compared to all other CI systems
- A good reporting system that allows all our different types of automation tests to produce output for
- Fantastically simple to setup and configure
- The biggest and only issue we have is the lack of a SaaS-based TeamCity solution. Currently, we have to host and maintain 1 big TeamCity server and up to 15 build agents to build our 1500+ builds
- We were able to ensure we're deploying the correct version of each component with ease and assurity
May 03, 2016
A easy and clean continuous evaluation tool.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
TeamCity was used by my team to do the continuous evaluation and integration of various projects under our team. It was used by our team only in our organisation. It was easy to spot wrong commits and build a failure before the product release. This was very easy with the help of a continuous integration tool like TeamCity that has a very versatile UI.
- By default, the TeamCity installation comes with embedded Hypersonic SQL DB (HSQLDB for short). It is a good database in its own right and has its strengths in the situations where you would need a fast and tightly integrated in-process DBMS embedded into your Java application. But running a production server on HSQLDB is risky.
- TeamCity offers much better security than Jenkins from out of box installation itself.
- Browser-hosted interface serves as the primary way to administer TeamCity users, agents, projects, and build configurations. It provides project status and reporting information suitable for a broad range of users and project stakeholders. It provides build progress, drill down detail, and history information on the projects and configurations.
- In TeamCity a single branch can be built dynamically. When configuring a Git or Mercurial VCS root, you need to specify the branch name to be used as the default.
- TeamCity download was about 535 MB. Starting up TeamCity server on Mac is quite a large space.
- When compared with the existing continuous integration tools the number of plug-ins available is much less for TeamCity.
- TeamCity provides continuous integration, automated build and continuous deployment for a price. When compared with the pioneers in CI field, which are free software, TeamCity is effective because the implementation, familiarisation and integration time is less.
- Effective hours to manage this tool is less, which increases the return on investment. But we have to pay while using for bigger number of projects is a drawback when there is free softwares in the market.
- Easy implementation.
- Cleaner dashboard and UI.
- Better documentation and tutorials.